Many of the earlier discerners of what was taking place in education (among other issues), were made aware of the technique which was so very successfully implemented to achieve the goals of the change agents in education. No matter how often it was explained, it was slow going getting any widespread understanding of just how the technique worked. Even less understanding is shown regarding the fact that this discovered Delphi Technique is far from limited to the educational minefields where it was first discovered.
The idea behind this results-achieving scheme is that people like to believe they are part of the decisionmaking process (a favorite change agent/educrat/policy-pushing term). People are so flattered by being brought into the “process” that they leave much of their thinking abilities at the door and dutifully line up to be herded into the path disguised as Our Best Thinking, later found to be Gotcha!
By that time, the damage is always done, though still rarely recognized until much later — mainly because Delphi is adept at “multi-tasking,” as educrats term the ability to perform and achieve results in several diverse things simultaneously.
Delphi-ing is successfully employed by those who know that what people would object to right up front (even those who aren’t up-to-speed on such things) must be skillfully spoon-fed in such clever increments that people end up believing that they have outsmarted any charlatans and taken the reins of decisionmaking into their own hands.
Like carnivals where shills are planted in the groups of potential customers, so also in public view, shills are planted to shift public opinion while appearing to be wanting to get public opinion on an issue before actually undertaking any action. In order to do this, clever manipulation techniques are put into play. “Is this an important issue? Then let’s define it so we know what it is and how best to deal with it. Okay, now let’s brainstorm pros and cons.”
Sounds good, doesn’t it? Especially if you haven’t noticed any clever insertions of the preliminary steps in media reports leading up to “getting the public involved.”
People are so excited about being asked for their opinion, and being totally unaware of their lack of input, they aren’t careful about how they state their opinions when asked. They don’t consider the big opportunity they give the other side to zero in on what the weak points are in the overall plans. What’s more, they don’t watch the reaction of the questioners, or the fact that suddenly, close to them, are people who are intensely eager tp present rebuttals. The rebuttals are surprisingly homed in on by the facilitators, who move on away from those who wish to clarify their views where others might be influenced by them. The decisions are now ripe for fine-tuning, while no real input was ever wanted or listened to by the facilitators — except that which was preconceived as leading to the desired outcome.
The Delphi Technique has moved on far beyond the education Decisionmaking Committees, and is in full-bore implementation in the national media on most issues of the day. Scant coverage is given prior to requests for public input, which usually take place in well-organized and carefully-scheduled focus groups or hearings. Immediately afterward, however, not only is skewed news available, but also almost instantaneous lengthy statements by those with the agendas to push, the programs ready to implement, the decisions that are already being readied for release.
Because most people have been already encouraged to forget everything that happened day before yesterday, or even yesterday, the Delphi Technique has become more and more the rule in mainstream media. It is often preferred by many “clients” of mainstream media, because to go to alternative news sources and apply logic and fact-sifting is to make one appear to be outside the realm of the movers, shakers and decisionmakers. Quick: up/down/decision. Only the “experts” are worth hearing from, and the “experts” have been accredited by the mainstream media — unlike those who present credible information in alternative sources, but who are not themselves “credible” by not being accredited by the accreditors.
Thus, the Delphi Technique has moved beyond the folding chairs and the magic markers on the giant paper pads or blackboards in places where concerned parents, taxpayers, voters, or members of groups were given token opportunities to state their opinions before being left behind when the scribbled marks were made and soon overridden by those inspired by the shills scattered through the meetings.
The Delphi Technique, thanks to media implementation, is now applied to issues far beyond its original use in education conflicts. It has long since moved on to entertainment, civic issues and all of politics. Not to mention religion, which has also been “discovered” by the Delphi proponents, as added fertile ground for further fine-tuning desired public reactions, which they wish to publicize and UTILIZE.
Regardless of what issue is currently being covered, focus on emotion; focus on group input much of which is delphi-ed before it registers on many “decisionmakers. Be one of the crowd, or be soon marginalized and removed from the virtual playing field of decisionmaking. Isn’t that the major message of media today? Shifting it and reaching those not affected by it is an uphill and multi-faceted task.
Until Americans learn to re-activate their memory-retrieval systems, apply that in assessing news, politics and things that are affecting them, and to decipher the Delphi-ing that is coming at them from all sides, they will have no major overall cultural, political and religious impact with input they make. They’ll be skillfully kept from publicly keying in on the deliberate diversions and deliberate timing of public information, reaction to it, and from effectively countering the publicity awarded to those who have been given the job of crafting the illusion of public involvement in decisionmaking.
Most of all, they will need to attract more Americans to join them in their efforts, to combat the entrenched and growing successes of the growing numbers of Delphi-converts to spread out across society and all that affects it.
One of the most important lessons that may need to be learned is that we can be as easily “Delphied” by friends as by foes! Vigilance seems to be more eternally needed than ever before.
Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact.”