The government becomes totalitarian: Feathering its own nest, not ours

Photo of author
Written By Paula Devlin

The very phrase “Homeland Security” makes the hackles go up. Why reinvent the wheel when the Department of Defense is supposed to do that? Why are they not defending our borders against invaders as is their stated purpose in the Constitution? Why are they spread out all over the world instead of protecting our citizenry? Are our young men and women in the military being unwittingly exploited to implement the New World Order agenda by bringing to heel all governments who don’t play by the NWO rules? Why does our military hire so many foreign mercenaries? Because it is being used for unconstitutional purposes?

The Washington Solutions to our problems are so typical of the arrogant, rich globalists who masquerade as elected officials and bureaucrats. They feather their own nests and foul ours. Their indexed retirement pay is a perfect example of their unbridled greed and willingness to sell out this nation for their private gain. With their own wealth assured, they then have the temerity to treat that Ponzi scheme, Social Security, as ordinary revenue, spend it, monetize it, then make a political soap opera about how they are going to take care of senior citizens.

There has been something of an open borders policy in this country for years. Now we have dual citizens from many countries, most notably dual citizens from Mexico, who are elected representatives in the Mexican legislature and living here.

Foreign nationals are rich enough to form non-profit NGO’s, contribute to (meaning buy-off) political campaigns and influence policy. These NGO’s get more representation and sympathy from our elected officials than do Americans.

There is hardly a foreign national group that does not have its own NGO lobbying anybody who’ll listen to the sound of folding cash coming across the desk. Why groups like CAIR, La Raza et alia are even allowed to have access to our politicians is terrifying. Surely it is not by accident or oversight. This is such an affront to our national sovereignty that any politician who would allow them into his office should be impeached for treason. It does not matter if the NGO’s have incorporated and are legal corporations in the United States: their goals are inimical to our national sovereignty and should be treated as such.

It has been an unmitigated disaster that an incompetent court reporter wrote headnotes to Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad (1886) which apparently gave corporations personhood, complete with the same protections as human persons. It was not part of that decision and never intended by the Constitution of the United States. That mistake, more than any other thing, has helped turn this nation from a democratic republic into the pre-eminent money-grubbing oligarchy from hell.

We have become a nation which bases its judgment of people on their net worth rather than wisdom and prudence. The rich consider themselves more qualified than the rest of the populace to determine our fate. They are the ones who hire the illegals (at least the nice ones) and see no problem with legalizing all of them. They are too cheap and lazy to do what is right. They want what is best for themselves, the rest of us be damned.

It would take real effort to round up the illegals, their families, their pickups, their fighting cocks and their pit bulls, microchip them and deport them. If our military weren’t chasing the results of our open borders and loose immigration policies, they would be able to help get this task done.

However, the effort should not be a top-down program (which is a recipe for yet another socioeconomic disaster). It needs to be done on the local level, with the federal bureaucracy used only for particular aspects of the project. The locals know where the illegals are and who they are. Local police must have the authority to arrest and deport them. Authority must be decentralized and the states empowered.

There must be a referendum in each state as to how each chooses to deal with illegals. This issue is too important to allow those who do not understand the problem to decide. Illegals should not have standing in courts, except as criminals subject to deportation. Those millions of women who have come across the border to have their babies (often at taxpayer expense) here so they can claim citizenship should also be deported. That Amendment was meant for those who had legally been admitted to this country and were awaiting citizenship. Certainly the authors could never have foreseen the hideous problem now created by its liberal interpretation.

Landowners along the borders must be allowed to be armed and shoot trespassers on sight (including the BLM and other cattle rustlers implementing the UN’s Agenda 21). Private property must be held sacred against the government and the UN just as much as against criminals.

The government needs to know that we will not tolerate our private property being taken away from us by illegals, criminals, greenies, BLM, Forest Service, EPA, et alia. We will not tolerate our right to protect our property, by force when necessary, being taken away. That intolerance must be directed towards empty-headed police chiefs and prosecutors who enforcing inane gun rules enacted by bureaucracies but never voted by the citizenry. It is a violation of human rights to deny men the right to protect their families and property from invaders.

Decent, law-abiding citizens have been led down a garden path by wolves in sheep’s clothing. Too many laws have been created by bureaucracies and others not accountable to voters. It is time to reverse that by demanding and electing politicians who ask what we can do for our country – as envisioned by the Founding Fathers – not what our country can do for us – as used by the globalists in their slick con jobs. Our government is already too totalitarian.

Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact.”

Leave a Comment