Bush and rush: Out of the closet

Published 11 years ago -  - 11y ago 22


“The way I feel is this: I feel liberated, and I’m going to tell you as plainly as I can why. I no longer am going to have to carry the water for people who I don’t think deserve having their water carried. . . .

“Now I’m liberated from having to constantly come in here every day and try to buck up a bunch of people who don’t deserve it, to try to carry the water and make excuses for people who don’t deserve it. I did not want to sit here and participate, willingly, in the victory of the libs, in the victory of the Democrat Party by sabotaging my own.”

That is what Rush Limbaugh told his audience the day after the debacle. Hmm. What does it mean if you no longer have to carry the water? Doesn’t it mean you were carrying the water before you stopped? What does carrying the water mean? It means you are a water boy, tending to the needs of your masters, a camp follower, fronting for them, cleaning up after them, etc.

For whom was Limbaugh carrying the water? For the Republicrud Party and the cruds who control it. At last, from his own mouth, we have his confession. Regular readers and listeners will recall that for many years, in print and on the air, I have been telling you that Rush Limbaugh is “talent on loan from the Republicrud National Committee,” in other words that he was carrying their water, fronting for them. Of course, he has righteously denied any such thing.

Now, in as many words, he admits it. All those years, he was lying. He is exactly what I said he was. Indeed, he says the people he carried water for and made excuses for all those years “don’t deserve it.” In other words, not only has he been lying about what he is, but he is also lying about what they are. He is “liberated.”

He is telling us this because he is jumping ship, screeching down the hawsers. As the ship goes down, he is desperately trying to maintain some credibility. Somebody please tell me how anyone from now on could believe anything this lying scumbag says. Indeed, during his on-the-air confession, “Mr. Snerdley” apparently used the word “lying” in the control room.

Notice also the reason Lying Limbaugh gives for his lying. “I did not want to sit here and participate, willingly, in the victory of the libs, in the victory of the Democrat Party by sabotaging my own.” In other words, he was loyal to party, not to principle. Question: If the people who run the party are truly as bad as you now say they are – as bad for the country as you now say they are – why would you support them; why would you even lie to get them elected?

The answer is clear, and it is the same reason he is now screeching down the hawser. He carried the water to advance his career and he now is jumping the ship to protect his career. Had the Republicruds won on Tuesday, he would now be boasting about them, still lying about them, crowing they had won because of his influence, but they would still be as bad as he now says they are.

The other practitioners of “right-wing” Communist talk radio are still in shock, except for Sean Hannity, the stupidest of them, who is too stupid to know he should be. Regular readers know that for years I have struggled to characterize this man. The best I could come up with was “Shallow Sean.” Now, here comes commentator Will Grigg, who leaves all competition speechless with his masterful explanation that the typical Hannity listener is a “Hannitoid,” which is “best described as a severely infected polyp in the descending colon of the body politic.”

Laura Ingraham typically “can’t understand” what is happening. At least she is honest enough to say so, but the reason she “can’t understand” is that she is too ignorant to listen. Certainly one benefit of the election results is the obvious chastening of these Republicrud twerps. It is hard to believe, I know, but I was able to listen to an entire hour of Levin without hearing him scream even once.

We should also say something about making nice. Because our Communist schools have been teaching collectivism for so long, and because our collectivized churches no longer preach evil, making nice has become the hallmark of respectability known today as “politically correct.” We’ll all make nice, we’ll go along to get along, we’ll defer, we’ll agree because “there’s some good in the worst of us.” Making nice presumably is related to the alleged feminization of the American male and the disappearance of testosterone.

In politics, this translates into the fact that Republicruds always cave. They strut and bluster, they preen their righteousness, they say bring it on, but then, at the moment of truth, they make nice, they cave. Why? For the obvious reason that the Republicruds don’t believe what they say any more than the Democruds believe it. They say it only because they know it is what the people want to hear.

But their deeds have found them out. If this last election proves anything it is that nice guys do finish last, because the last few years have revealed the Republicruds to be even worse than the Democruds. Making nice in this racket means you lose. Notice that you never need to wonder where Tom Tancredo and Dr. Ron Paul stand, but those two Republicans won easy re-election.

Along these lines, in his confession speech, Lying Limbaugh also said this: “Some of the exit poll data yesterday (it’s still questionable whether or not you can believe it). By an 11% margin, voters who voted yesterday believe that Republicans are ‘the big government party now.’ How can you blame them? How can you blame them with the Medicare entitlement and with all the education spending, the spending on everything, the lack of discipline on reducing the size and scope of government?”

Now he tells us. If the Republicrud Party is the big government party now, doesn’t that mean the Democrud Party is the small government party now? A commentator more loyal to principle and country than to party would have told us this all along, demanding that the Republicruds change direction.

Which brings us to the sorriest imitation of a man, a man who is not – not – not a Texan, a sleazy Yankee carpetbagger from Maine, a grinning mountebank who made a reputation by making nice, “cooperating” with the Democruds in Austin as governor, now el presidente Jorge W. Boosh. Now, after the debacle, Boosh is ready to cooperate more than ever. But let’s let Lying Limbaugh tell the story:

“The president was passionate about one thing in this press conference. He came alive when he was asked a question about: What does this mean for your immigration policy? ‘Yes, I think we have a better chance of getting immigration reform now with a Democrat-controlled Congress.’

”. . . Now with Democrats running the place you’re going to get it and the president’s excited about it. We’re going to get a guest worker program. We’re going to get amnesty. It’s going to be called ‘immigration reform,’ and you’re going to get a minimum wage increase. The president’s going to talk to these people about entitlements . . . .”

Lying Limbaugh and the other right-wing Communist radio pukes should have been warning us about this all along. But they did not. What does it mean? It means that Boosh is not at all what the bushbots told us he was, not at all what the preachers who turned him into an object of veneration said he was, not at all what the Republicrud leaders said he was.

As I have been saying all along, George W. Bush is a Communist world government traitor. He never has been anything else, even when he was a career drunk. Now that he has succeeded in getting rid of some of the pesky Republicans in Congress, he can get to his goal of world government more easily by working with his true allies, the Democruds. As I write, he is getting into (political) bed with Nancy, who is of course a typical multi-millionaire Socialist, except more so.

It will be fascinating to see whether a delicious cat fight erupts between Nancy, a doctrinaire Socialist, and Hillaroid, the nation’s leading cause of lower back pain. Was she a member of the Communist Party in college? I don’t know, but I would not be surprised to hear it. Triumphantly re-elected by Yankee boobs, she now will put her campaign for President into warp speed. Will Nancy challenge her for Party control?

Until enough Americans recognize what Boosh is and that the Republicrud Party has pulled the same scam on us since Wendell Willkie, there is no hope that our politics could return to relative sanity. They will keep doing it. Why change anything? It works and “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” right?

I believe it is better for the power to be divided than for it to be in one place. Now let’s see how right or wrong I am when I say that because the conspiracy for world government controls both its Republicrud and Democrud subsidiaries at the top, there will be a dramatic change in style and some minor changes in policy emanating from the District of Criminals, but no major change in direction. Nancy will not close down the biggest U.S. embassy in the world, now under construction in Baghdad.

Question: If Lying Limbaugh no longer will carry water for the Republicruds, whose water will this hypocritical suckup now carry?

Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact.”

22 recommended
comments icon 0 comments
0 notes
316 views
bookmark icon

Write a comment...

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *