Are “new world order” proponents: traitors or just misguided?
Before we say, or even imply, that any U. S. government official in a position of power and authority could be guilty of treason we must have some criterion to use in putting forth such a damning claim.
I submit that there are several criteria which could logically apply; however the one that carries the most weight— the subverting of which may constitute treasonous acts—is the Constitution of the United States.
If we can’t use the Constitution as a lawful guideline for all American citizenry, what can we use?
This dangerous dilemma is being called to your attention for two reasons: One, there are incessant rumblings about how we are being deceived by secret, super-elite organizations dedicated to bringing America into a “new world order.”
Two, there are, and were, people in key positions in our government who not only espouse the idea of a “new world order” but in so doing flaunt the U.S. Constitution and foreswear America as a sovereign nation.
This, in my book, suggests treasonous acts, and the evidence is both convincing and abundant. Consider these two disparate statements:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Pretty clear and forthright, isn’t it?
Now, consider this statement by George Herbert Walker Bush:
“The world can therefore seize the opportunity (Persian Gulf crisis) to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind.”
And again, President Bush at the U.N., February 1, 1992: “It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people henceforth pledge their allegiance.”
That’s also pretty clear, is it not?
Like it or not, we are forced to believe that President George H.W. Bush was ignoring America’s sovereignty, and worse, he was guilty of violating his oath of office. Nowhere in our Constitution is there a reference to a New World Order or of our eventual allegiance to any “global” charter. Therefore, Bush either was playing expedient politics, or—there’s another name for it.
And don’t be fooled that a New World Order for America is the objective of just a few ambitious politicians, or that the NWO concept is a fad that will soon disappear. This treacherous idea has been in the minds of power hungry elitists for decades, and is now ominously rolling into high gear.
If you doubt that, consider these other statements:
“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete. All states will recognize a single global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”— Strobe Talbot, President Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, July 20, 1992.
“NAFTA is a major stepping stone to the New World Order,” —Henry Kissinger.
“To achieve a world government it is necessary to remove from the minds their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism. and religious dogma.”—Brock Adams, Director, U.N. Health Organization.
“We are not going to achieve a New World Order without paying for it in blood, as well as in words and money.”—Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., the CFR Journal Foreign Affairs, August 1975.
“A world government can intervene militarily in the internal affairs of any nation when it disapproves of their activities.” —Kofi Annan, UN Secretary General.
“We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.”— James Warburg, to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, February 17, 1950.
“We believe we are creating the beginning of a New World Order coming out of the collapse of the U.S. Soviet antagonisms.”—Brent Snowcroft, Washington Post, May 1991.
“We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to stop and deter aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt’s and Winston Churchill’s vision for peace for the post-war period.”—Richard Gebhardt,
“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world.”— Professor Arnold Toynbee, 1931. a speech in Copenhagen.
“Our job is not to give people what they want but what we decide they ought to have.”—Richard Salant, former president of CBS News.
= = = = = = = =
But not every person of influence and authority buys, or has ever bought, the argument for a “beneficent” New World Order. Through the years, the keen eye has always seen these global schemes for what they are: threats to sovereignty and dangerous to freedom.
These people, for example:
“The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes.”—Felix Frankfurter Supreme Court Justice, 1952.
“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.”— Benjamin Disraeli, first Prime Minister of England.
“Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the fields of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere, so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”—Woodrow Wilson, 1913.
“The high office of the president has been used to foment a plot to destroy America’s freedom, and before I leave office I must inform the citizens of this plight.”—President John F. Kennedy, November 12, 1963.
President Kennedy warned us about the existence of the “new world order” crowd on November 12th, 1963. Ten days later he was gunned down. To believe that John Kennedy might have been “eliminated” because of what he was revealing to the American people is not a big stretch, knowing what we now know.
If patriotic and caring citizens are determined to stop America’s downward slide into “big brother” tyranny we need to think about what certain voices are saying, and call it what it is.
“Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact.”