YOU WANT TO BE FAIR NOW?
TRY THIS OTRAUMA!
By: R.A. Hawkins
read that you, Obama the Anointed 0ne, now want to form a panel to create a set of
Best Practices Rules for Elections I knew exactly what you meant. You want to
seal the leftist deal for the next election. I have a better idea really. In the last big
general election, just like in the one that brought you into power, there was an
unprecedented amount of voter fraud that was never prosecuted. Its obvious at this
point that states that hold fraudulent elections wont prosecute the fraud
themselves, so its time for everyone else to put those election officials and states
in their place. I also remember the leftists trying to get the United Nations to observe
our elections to ensure there were no attempts at voter disenfranchisements. (Which is
what voter fraud is really all about
disenfranchising everyone elses vote)
Since your side of the aisle is in the habit of trying to involve people in our elections
that benefit more from the failure of our nation as opposed to our success
Hows about we try something fair for once? (Notice how I try to sound familiar to
throw you off?)
Its time for States Rights to begin to rise to the level of prominence that it
needs to be. Its time for all of us flyover states to decide whether we approve of
the way you ran your leftist election. Thats right we decide, not the fox in the
henhouse. We can use our governors to create a panel to represent the real workers party.
(The ones that actually work, not the saprophytes party of the left.) We should also have
the ability to arrest those committing voter fraud. Or even better, decertify your
elections until you purge your voter rolls and prosecute the fraud. Im certain you
will want to consider this option because its actually fair, you little
comstitutional squaller. No, I spelled that right. I know a Constitutional Scholar when I
see one. Maybe someone like Sowell or so many others that arent you. The answer is 0. (Thats how I prefer to refer to you by the way.) Now since you
probably dont understand the simple math question here Ill explain it. Not one
of those voters is faithful to you because like a politician or any other red dress on a
street corner, its all about the highest bidder. Those voters sure are a lot like
you. They cant do math either because now they have to share their stolen wealth
with someone else. That stuff for the other one hundred? It has to come from somewhere
else. Which is why you just keep printing money isnt it Zero? Youre stealing
By the way, I did notice that you have a full understanding of two concepts. When the
awesome possibility of being able to bust up a joint on a street corner raised its head,
it worked. A large number of clueless, misinformed pointy headed voters responded and went
to the polls probably for the first time. And they voted you in. That little bit of name
calling about those voters really is just an echo from James Carville who agrees that your
voters are the most misinformed. I prefer to not say that theyre just misinformed so
much as being idiots that cant handle simple math. Heres what I mean in that
comment. If Sally had 25 saprophyte voters that wanted stuff and she managed convince them
through the ideals of altruism just like Hitler did to give amnesty to one hundred
potential new voters how many faithful voters would she have?
Gosh, that thing that I said you understood when I
mentioned something about dope smoking voters. Yeah
I remember now. The reason you
said youre not going to prosecute federal marijuana laws in Colorado is simple,
really: It prevents Colorado voters from figuring it out. You couldnt have those
people getting together with the rest of the country in a States Rights battle, now could
you? And wow, theres that other thing you understand so well: Maintaining division.
Now it may surprise you to know that Im not against making
marijuana legal as long as we take it the rest of the way. You cant remember to get
up and go to work so you cant keep a job? Well
. You pays your money and
you takes your chances! I am not responsible for your stupid life choices. But then, if
you really take a good look at the left what is their platform? Youre cool,
dude. Its someone elses fault and well punish them for you.
For everyone else in flyover country: Quit supporting the liberal
media in any way whatsoever. If you find that a company supports this idiot in the White
House boycott them and encourage others to do the same. Its time for them to pay the
price for their corruption. And I know it sounds a little liberal to say this, but
remember one very important thing: Every penny you spend creates the world you live in. If
youre buying things from a company that supports something you disagree with you are
supporting that which you hate. It really is that simple. And regarding the last election,
those of you who decided to either sit at home in protest or do a protest vote
up. Youre a major part of the problem. Recent history should have taught all of us
one thing by now: absolutism will always lose to incrementalism. Dont believe me?
Just ask any rounded rock at the bottom of any stream. Yes, I just compared your
intelligence to that of a rock. Deal with it.
"Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication
allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact."
R.A. Hawkins is the
author of several books. He is a past contributor for Ether Zone.
R.A. Hawkins can be reached at: firstname.lastname@example.org
We invite you to visit his website at: http://www.entropical-paradise.com/
the April 15, 2013 issue of
Copyright © 1997 - 2013 Ether Zone.
We invite your
comments on this article in our forum!