By: Don Boys, Ph.D.

Since the Fall of man, the earth has been cursed with women (and men) who used their bodies in illicit ways. They have been called loose women, prostitutes, whores, fallen women, and sluts; however, in earlier days, there was a sense of shame and disgrace in their activities. Even Hollywood lowlifes tried to be discrete. While “slut” is considered offensive, so is the lifestyle.

When I was young, if an unmarried woman got pregnant, she was sent to “visit her grandmother” for a few months. The family still loved her, wanted the best for her, forgave her, but there was a lasting sense of shame. But those days are long gone. Society calls it “reproductive freedom” but God calls it whoredom; and status, beauty, money, and education don’t change anything.

Yes, any of our unmarried daughters can get pregnant and it is a heartbreaking situation, but when it happens again and again, the young woman is a slut, whether she is my daughter or yours. Of course, getting pregnant doesn’t make her a slut, being sexually immoral does. Sex outside of marriage is always wrong.

It is not illegal to be promiscuous, male or female; but a recent graduate law student has shocked the nation by her advocacy for slutism. Her audacity and lack of shame are appalling. While she did not admit to casual sex, she did plead the cause of sluts everywhere. Loose women and men who sleep together take the risk of walking away with more than they expected! With all the STDs out there I am amazed that prostitutes can stay in business. It shows that many men think below, not above the belt. In congressional testimony to Congress and the world she appeared to have no shame, decency, self-respect, or morals as she advocated for casual sex. Some people will do anything for 15 minutes of fame. Or infamy. She wants me to pay for a girl’s roll in the hay! That is insanity. When you play, you pay. Not me.

It is scary to realize that she will be an approved, licensed, commissioned, and accredited attorney in a couple of years. I remind everyone that this lady, oops, this woman wants taxpayers to fund recreational sex because it is a health issue; but graduate students can buy their own birth control pills (for as little as $9.00 per month) or require their male sluts to provide their own protection. Or maybe have parents finance their fornication.

I wonder if her parents are hiding in a dark cave somewhere! Maybe, just maybe their permissive child-training contributed to and encouraged her sexual lunacy!

Moreover, if recreational sex for a female is a health issue that citizens should fund then how about paying me for recreational golf since that too is a health issue.

Feminists are trying to make this a birth control issue but no one is trying to limit birth control availability. Normal people simply insist that the promiscuous should provide their own.

No birth control method is 100% accurate but female sluts could solve their problems by using the old American standby, the aspirin between the knees. That is a 100% sure way to prevent pregnancy and STDs. Any woman can go to a government-financed clinic and get “free” birth control. But that would be “demeaning.”

Moreover, if women can’t pay for birth control then their parents can do so. According to her testimony, a woman needs $3,000 to fund her recreation through grad school. The Bible calls such people, male and female, whores. Sluts might consider getting a J-O-B to fund their recreational expenses.

She whines about the need for financial help to the sexual active but life is tough and as that great philosopher John Wayne declared, “Life is tough….it’s even tougher if you’re stupid.”

If taxpayers pay for birth control, why not food, autos, hair spray, deodorant, vacations, daily paper, wide screen television, ad nauseam. Our budding attorney said, “Women like her have no choice but to go without contraception,” (speaking of a female college friend without insurance that pays for birth control). No, they can stop recreational sex. Problem solved and money saved.

If taxpayers are required to pay for birth control then I suppose they will also pay for a designated driver when a drunk gets drunk and needs a ride home.

How about paying a man if his absence of sexual activity causes him to be stressed out and have emotional problems, should taxpayers pay for his weeks out of work to regain his “health”? Would this be true for unmarried men or any man who doesn’t get to have as much sexual activity as he wants!

The testifying co-ed is just a fluke, not representative of ladies, and from her testimony it is obvious to me that a graduate student demanding taxpayers fund illicit sex is a little nutty and a whole lot slutty.

"Published originally at : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact."

Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives, author of 14 books, frequent guest on television and radio talk shows, and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. His most recent book is ISLAM: America's Trojan Horse! His new eBook, The God Haters is available for $9.99 from   He is a new columnist for Ether Zone.

Dr. Don Boys can be reached at:

Published in the March 5, 2012 issue of  Ether Zone.
Copyright 1997 - 2012 Ether Zone.

We invite your comments on this article in our forum!