BACKWARDS FROM IRAQ TO 911
MIHOP OR LIHOP OR GCN

By: Nathanael

There is a psychological game that one has to play when making a conclusion or deduction about what happened on and before 911. 

As in a courtroom or crime scene examination, we have to think backwards from the facts or evidence at hand, as would a criminal investigator. Thinking this way can be sufficient to shatter an alibi, explanation or the "official story" about 911. The Perpetrators of 911 know that the general public does not generally apply this frame of mind. But the tide is turning, as shown by the fact that 42% of the American people believe there was a cover up and an additional 10% are not sure. 

It is now being reported that the Intelligence Community smelled that “something was coming” and tried to give warning to BushCo. For example: 

Two Months Before 9/11, an Urgent Warning to Rice
October 1, 2006, Washington Post 

9/11 Panel Members Weren’t Told of Meeting
October 2, 2006, New York Times 

Tenet told 9/11 panel that he warned Rice of Al Qaeda
October 3, 2006, Boston Globe/Washington Post 

Rumsfeld, Ashcroft received warning of al Qaida attack before 9/11

October 02, 2006 

BushCo likely already knew that “something was coming” because it was going to be part of a larger scheme. Condi Rice and others do not want to acknowledge having received these warnings prior to 911 in order to preserve plausible deniability.

BushCo having had substantial notification before 911 from the Intelligence Community of a coming terrorist threat in conjunction with the complete failure of the military air defenses, NORAD responses and FAA procedures on 911 leaves only three possible conclusions. Either BushCo...

  • MIHOP (made it happen on purpose) or
  • LIHOP (let it happen on purpose) or
  • is guilty of Gross Criminal Negligence and dereliction of duty in failing to protect the nation when directly warned about a soon to come terrorist attack.

The unknown details of who did what and how on 911 do matter but not in order to come the conclusion that BushCo is directly responsible for 911.

Thinking backwards from the reality of the Iraq War and the Global War On Terror being the end goal, then the blood rage of the American people was requisite via a New Pearl Harbor on 911.

Motive => GWBush wants war in Iraq and in other places 

           Opportunity => 911 creates a blood rage in the public mind that then gives                                       him license to warmonger as he pleases

Only one of the above three possibilities, MIHOP or LIHOP or GCN, makes any sense.

Would you allow a ragtag bunch of Arabs with box cutters who are incapable of flying sophisticated airliners to have any chance of failing to complete the "terror attacks"? ... to say nothing of gambling that a fully functional US air defense network would not stop the hijacked planes? LIHOP makes no sense.

If one assumes that gross criminal negligence on the part of Rice, Rumsfeld, et al was at work, then the complete break down of the air defense network is ludicrous. Why? Because the trillions of dollars spent and the incredible competence of the
US air defenses are all always on the job. There are preset standard operating procedures, practiced thousands of times, which are never not in operation but did not perform on 9/11/01. Do you remember the Payne Stewart intercept in 1999? US Air Force jets were dispatched in less than 30 minutes after the ground controllers lost radio communications with his Learjet. GCN makes no sense.

Control and certainty of the outcome were mandatory in order to bring about the public psychology needed to go to war in
Iraq and bring about the GWOT. 
MIHOP is the only scenario that makes sense.

The universal desire by radical Muslims to attack the Great Satan -
America - is ever present but was used in this case as an easily swallowed cover story.

GWBush and his minions have been exposed and serious trouble is brewing. 

Will the Congress find a spine and pursue immediate impeachment?

Not likely since counterbalancing blackmail surely exists. 

The solution is the direct criminal indictment and prosecution of BushCo. The dilemma is finding an attorney with the courage to actually follow his oath and file the proper charges in a Federal Court. If there is such a legal-creature and Judge Anna Diggs Taylor has proper venue and jurisdiction, please consider pursuing BushCo in her courtroom. 

"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."

--Hermann Göring at the
Nuremberg Trials 1946  

Ephesians 5:11-13 (New American Standard Bible) 

11 Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose them;

12 for it is disgraceful even to speak of the things which are done by them in secret.

13 But all things become visible when they are exposed by the light, for everything that becomes visible is light.

 


"Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact."


Nathanael is a self-employed engineer and lives in metropolitan area of Dallas, Texas. He had only ever been a life long registered Republican but changed to the Constitution Party in May of 2004. He is a regular columnist for Ether Zone.

Nathanael can be reached at nathanael4551@yahoo.com

Published in the October 6, 2006 issue of  Ether Zone.
Copyright © 1997 - 2006 Ether Zone.

We invite your comments on this article in our forum!