Images of the North Tower from American Flight 11 and the South Tower from United Flight 175 at the World Trade Centers show dramatic evidence of the typical impact signature from the crash of an intact jet airliner. It imprints essentially the full wingspan of the aircraft not just the fuselage.

Furthermore and what has been raised in numerous investigative web sites is that there was virtually no leftover debris from the crash of AA #77. To that point, where is the tail section? In virtually all known jet liner crashes the tail section, the most structurally robust portion of the plane, survives to some degree intact and recognizable. This was the case in the Cypriot Helios Airways jet that crashed on Aug. 14, 2005 - see the images here. Why not at the Pentagon? Where is the tail of AA #77?

The rules of physics did not change on September 11, 2001. Without saying what actually did hit the Pentagon or what happened to AA#77, it is necessary to conclude that it was not a Boeing 757-200 that struck the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

Less than two weeks after the Teterboro jet accident, a major fire broke out and totally engulfed the 32-story Windsor building in Madrid, Spain but it did not collapse. Even a construction crane on the roof remained in place. Please view the images at this site. There was concern that the weakened steel skeleton would collapse and fall over on to the surrounding buildings.

However, it did not fall over and did not implode coming to rest in its own footprint as did WTC I and II. In relative comparison to the Windsor building, WTC I and II had no fire damage whatsoever and yet they "failed" catastrophically "supposedly" due in large part to heat induced metal fatigue. What is far more plausible and likely is that WTC I and II were intentionally "pulled" as was WTC 7.

No airliner on 09/11/01 impacted WTC 7 but it was intentionally demolished later that day. Why? So when were the charges set for the controlled implosion of WTC7? Were they set earlier on September 11, 2001 or days before? Were the occupants of the building informed that their office building had been rigged with explosives?

Publicly unasked and unanswered questions abound, which seriously raise doubt about the "official story" of what really happened on 09/11/01. In 2004 a Zogby poll showed that … Half of New Yorkers Believe US Leaders Had Foreknowledge of Impending 9-11 Attacks and "Consciously Failed" To Act.

Two more questions should be asked when the likelihood of 09/11/01 being an inside job is considered.

1. Can it be possible that the FedGov and the US Military would consider attacking its own citizens?

2. To what end or goal would such a treasonous attack be executed?

As to question 1, in March of 1962 the Joint Chiefs of Staff submitted for consideration to JFK a murderous scheme titled Operation Northwoods as reported by ABC News and George Washington University. This plan recommended the attack on American cities by clandestine American military forces as a ruse and pretext for going to war with Cuba. An "inside job" visited on Americans by the American military had already been considered four decades earlier. Why was no one in the US military who took part in this concoction arrested for treason and conspiracy to commit mass murder?

As to question 2, would the fraudulently constructed War in Iraq have been emotionally/politically possible if the massive psychology mind warping of The People caused by 09/11/01 had not occurred first? No. If the current Administration is capable of executing an illegal war of aggression, based on "a hoax " in which hundreds of thousands die needlessly, then it is not a stretch to conclude that 09/11/01 was an inside job resulting in the desired New Pearl Harbor needed to launch a war in Iraq and other places.

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State." Joseph Goebbels

"Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play." Joseph Goebbels

Whether it happens here and abroad, is not mass murder perpetrated by your elected agents without provocation at least a theological matter?

Who will fill the shoes of Dietrich Bonhoeffer or Martin Niemoller?

Is the no need for another expression of the Confessing Church?