THE SODOMITE PLAN (II)
By: Alan Stang
Last week, we began to look at the supreme question of what
we must do to save America. We saw that it is decisively important to recognize why
the things that are destroying America happen, to recognize that the reason they happen is
not impersonal forces we can do nothing about, but because men with names and addresses
conspire to commit them. They dont "just happen" for "no
We called these men who conspire to destroy America conspirators who are conducting a
conspiracy, but remember that the word "conspiracy" is simply a shorthand way of
saying that such things dont happen by accident but only because someone concocts
and commits them deliberately.
We chose an issue to demonstrate how differently victims respond when they learn
someone has been victimizing them deliberately, and the timely issue we chose for the
purpose is the present, nationwide explosion of sodomy. It is no doubt fair to say that
most normal victims today think it is "just happening." How differently would
they feel were they to know that the present, disgusting extrusion of buggery is the work
of a minutely orchestrated plan. That is what our little experiment is designed to
Lets look at a couple of books. First, lets look at The
Trouble with Harry Hay: Founder of the Modern Gay Movement (Boston, Alyson
Publications, 1990) by Stuart Timmons. Harry himself was a longtime member of the
Communist Party. He was the preeminent founder of the Mattachine Society. Timmons speaks
of "the Marxist background of the five Mattachine founders. . . ." (P. 150)
Indeed: ". . . The group experience of the ex-C.P. members provided a vital blueprint
for the shape that Mattachine was to take. . . ." (Loc. Cit.)
So, the founders of the "modern gay movement" were Communists. They
werent "ex"-Communists because they had broken with the Party. As
"ex"-Communists, they were just as Communist as they had been. The difference
was that as "ex"-Communists, they would not embarrass the Party for what they
had been assigned to do.
Stuart Timmons also says this: ". . . Harry followed the Masonic model so
carefully that he designed a series of lapel pins . . . ." Also, "Harry had
found his model, the Freemasons of the eighteenth century . . . ." (P. 152) He is
talking of course about the Illuminati who had fled Bavaria ahead of the police, went to
Paris, infiltrated the Grand Orient Masonic Lodges and inspired the Communist French
Revolution of 1789.
How conspiratorial could this be if it was published in a book? Well, it was the job of
the media, the Prostitute National Press, to report this. Had you ever heard of it before
you read it here? How many normal people of your acquaintance would browse through a book
about the "modern gay movement?"
The other book is After The Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of
Gays in the 90s (New York, Doubleday, 1989), by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen,
Ph.D. Needless to say, both these authors are homosexuals. After The Ball is
sodomys version of the Communist Manifesto combined with the teachings of
Why are the American people presently being deluged with sodomite propaganda? The
authors explain that "to desensitize straights to gays and gayness, inundate them in
a continuous flood of gay-related advertising presented in the least offensive fashion
possible. If straights cant shut off the shower, they may at least eventually get
used to being wet." (P. 149)
So the present inundation is part of the Plan. Desensitization is one of the
techniques. "Jamming" is another: "The trick is to get the bigot into the
position of feeling a conflicting twinge of shame, along with his reward, whenever his
homohatred surfaces, so that his reward will be diluted or spoiled. . . . Thus,
propagandistic advertisement can depict homophobic and homohating bigots as crude
loudmouths and assholes - people who say not only faggot but
nigger, kike, and other shameful epithets - who are not
Christian. It can show them being criticized, hated, shunned. It can depict gays
experiencing horrific suffering as the direct result of homohatred . . . ." (P. 151)
So you are not getting "wet" by accident, but because sodomites behind the
scenes planned it that way. Notice what happens these days to people who speak up. They
are viciously excoriated by the sissies who put their pants on backwards at the New
York Times. Remember John Rocker? He was not the first man to be rockered, but I have
named the technique after him. Indeed, desensitization and jamming are carefully designed
to lead to phase three, conversion.
"Please dont confuse Conversion with political Subversion. . .
. Yet, ironically, by Conversion we actually mean something far more profoundly
threatening to the American Way of Life, without which no truly sweeping social change can
occur. We mean conversion of the average Americans emotions, mind, and will, through
a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the
media. We mean subverting the mechanism of prejudice to our own ends - using
the very processes that made America hate us to turn their hatred into warm regard -
whether they like it or not." (Pp. 153-54, emphasis added)
Please reread that paragraph a couple of times. You are under attack. The attack is
planned; as you can see, it is meticulously planned, brilliantly planned. It is
psychological. The last thing you could say about it is that it "just happened,"
that its a bizarre fad; that it mysteriously erupted all by itself in the zeitgeist,
There is a name for what we are talking about. That name is brainwashing. Yes, I
know I keep repeating myself; learn to live with it because I will not let you up until
you read Ed Hunters classic works on the subject: Brainwashing and Brainwashing
in Red China. Ed is the journalist who coined the word, and that is what the Marxists
are doing to us now. You will not understand the full horror of what is happening in
America until you read them.
Notice that the purpose of the propaganda is to change your thinking, against your
will, whether you like it or not, keeping you in ignorance of the process. Notice that the
change would make a revolution; that it would utterly destroy what we mean by the American
Way of Life.
Now remember Antonio Gramsci, founder of the Italian Communist Party. Gramsci taught
that it would be impossible for the Communists to conquer America in a frontal attack, by
seizing the government in a military strike, as they did in Russia. In America, he taught,
the Communists need to reverse the traditional strategy. First, the Communists would
utterly pervert our institutions; when they become sufficiently perverted, they will be
too rotten to support the government, which then will collapse "like overripe fruit
into our hands," as Lenin is supposed to have said.
Isnt that what is happening? Are we not collapsing into the hands of overripe
fruit? Indeed, the authors of After The Ball speak of "conspiring with liberal
elites within the legal and legislative systems." They tell us that the goal
"has been to forge a little entente or conspiracy with the power elite, to
jump ahead of public sentiment or ignore it altogether." They speak of using
"executive orders (which sidestep the democratic process) . . . ." (P. 171)
Notice that the word "conspiracy" is theirs. They call it that themselves.
Certainly no one could object if we too call it that. They speak of ignoring public
sentiment altogether and of sidestepping the democratic process. Another name for doing
those things is Fascism or Communism, some form of dictatorship, no surprise in the
context of Gramscian strategy.
This breathtaking confession that the conspiracy is both illegal and totalitarian,
recalls the old cliché: Would that my enemy had written a book! It is difficult to write
a book and not give oneself away. After The Ball is full of what the lawyers call
admissions against interest.
For instance, the sodomites mercilessly rocker anyone who dares to suggest publicly
that buggery is behavior some individuals choose, because if you choose it you can
be blamed for it. Instead, they insist, they were born that way. According to our authors,
they "are victims of circumstance, . . . they no more chose their sexual
orientation than they did, say, their height, skin color, talents, or limitations. . .
." (P. 184)
Really? But now get this: " . . . (We argue that . . . gays should be considered
to have been born gay - even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to
be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental
factors during childhood and early adolescence.) To suggest in public that homosexuality
might be chosen is to open the can of worms labeled moral choice and
sin and give the religious Intransigents a stick to beat us with. Straights must be
taught that it is as natural for some persons to be homosexual as it is for others to be
heterosexual: wickedness and seduction have nothing to do with it. And since no choice is
involved, gayness can be no more blameworthy than straightness. . . ." (Loc. Cit.)
In other words, they suggest, the truth that homosexuality is chosen during childhood
and early adolescence because of seduction must be suppressed, because if straights
understand that, the sodomites will be blamed. Consider that seduction of the vulnerable
teenager must be - must be - a part of the sodomite cabal, for the obvious reason that
since sodomites do not reproduce, they must recruit.
Okay, we have used up our allotted space, but we have given you enough to think about
for a week. Well conclude our examination of this aspect of the conspiracy next
week. Meanwhile, take a week to consider the following question: If you didnt know
any of this before, has your attitude toward it changed in any way now that you know it?
Related Article: Degenereate America... The Sodomite Plan (1)
originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink
Alan Stang has been a network radio talk show host and was one of
Mike Wallace's first writers. He was a senior writer for American Opinion magazine
and has lectured around the world for more than 30 years. He is also the author of ten
books, including, most recently, Perestroika Sunset, surrounding our Government's
deception in the POW/MIA arena. If you would like him to address your group, please email
what you have in mind. He is a regular columnist for Ether Zone.
Alan Stang can be reached at: email@example.com
Published in the July 28, 2003 issue of Ether Zone.
Copyright © 1997 - 2003 Ether
We invite your
comments on this article in our forum!